Advocates cannot seek information under RTI Act for clients’ cases: CIC

The commission said in the absence of any explanation as to why the supplier himself could not seek the information, “it appears that the appellant has sought information on behalf of his client per se, which is not permissible”.

Quoting a Madras High Court order, the CIC underlined that “a practising advocate cannot seek information relating to the cases instituted by him on behalf of his client”.

The high court had cautioned that otherwise, “every practising advocate would invoke the provisions of the RTI Act for getting information on behalf of his client”, which “does not advance the objects of the scheme of the RTI Act”.

The commission further quoted the ruling to stress that the “laudable objectives of the RTI Act cannot be used for personal ends and should not become a tool in the hands of the advocate for seeking all kinds of information in order to promote his practice”.

Taking note of the claims made by the public authority that several records were destroyed in a fire and that personal information was rightly denied under exemptions, the CIC said it found “no infirmity in the reply furnished by the CPIO”.

The appeal was accordingly disposed of, with a direction to share copies of written submissions with the appellant.